Many articles, including a piece published here at Slate and a 2011 New York Times op-ed titled “Delay Kindergarten at Your Child’s Peril,” have deftly argued against the practice. If all this makes you think redshirting is a really bad idea, you’re not alone. The National Association of Early Childhood Specialists and the National Association for the Education of Young Children fiercely oppose it, saying that redshirting “labels children as failures at the outset of their school experience.” Studies that have evaluated how well redshirted kids fare compared to their schooled-on-time peers conclude that redshirting provides no long-term academic or social advantages and can even put kids at a disadvantage. This so-called “academic redshirting,” a nod to the practice of keeping young athletes on the bench until they are bigger and more skilled, is highly controversial. They wait a year so that their savvy 6-year-olds can better handle the curriculum. Perhaps it’s unsurprising, then, that an estimated 9 percent of parents don’t send their 5-year-olds to kindergarten anymore. As many experts I spoke to for this column told me, kindergarten is the new first grade. Many schools have ditched play-based exploratory programs in favor of direct instruction and regular testing, in part thanks to the pressure to improve grade-school test scores. ![]() I look back fondly on kindergarten-I remember soaring around the playground as an eagle with my friend Kathleen-but kindergarten today is a vastly different beast than it was 30 years ago. The families were excited but also mildly terrified. Last week, two of my neighbors sent their 5-year-olds on the school bus for the first time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |